Decision Matrix Analysis
Making a Decision by Weighing Up Different Factors
(Also known as Grid Analysis, Pugh Matrix Analysis, and Multi-Attribute Utility Theory)
Imagine that your boss has put you in charge of taking on a new outsourced IT supplier. You've already identified several different suppliers, and you now need to decide which one to use.
You could decide to go with the low-cost option. But you don't want to make your decision on cost alone – factors such as contract length, underlying technology, and service levels need to be taken into consideration. So how can you make sure you make the best decision, while taking all of these different factors into account?
Decision Matrix Analysis is a useful technique to use for making a decision. It's particularly powerful where you have a number of good alternatives to choose from, and many different factors to take into account. This makes it a great technique to use in almost any important decision where there isn't a clear and obvious preferred option.
Being able to use Decision Matrix Analysis means that you can take decisions confidently and rationally, at a time when other people might be struggling to make a decision.
Click here to view a transcript of this video.
How to Use the Tool
Decision Matrix Analysis works by getting you to list your options as rows on a table, and the factors you need consider as columns. You then score each option/factor combination, weight this score by the relative importance of the factor, and add these scores up to give an overall score for each option.
While this sounds complex, this technique is actually quite easy to use. Here's a step-by-step guide with an example. Start by downloading our free worksheet. Then work through these steps.
Step 1
List all of your options as the row labels on the table, and list the factors that you need to consider as the column headings. For example, if you were buying a new laptop, factors to consider might be cost, dimensions, and hard disk size.
Step 2
Next, work your way down the columns of your table, scoring each option for each of the factors in your decision. Score each option from 0 (poor) to 5 (very good). Note that you do not have to have a different score for each option – if none of them are good for a particular factor in your decision, then all options should score 0.
Step 3
The next step is to work out the relative importance of the factors in your decision. Show these as numbers from, say, 0 to 5, where 0 means that the factor is absolutely unimportant in the final decision, and 5 means that it is very important. (It's perfectly acceptable to have factors with the same importance.)
Tip:
These values may be obvious. If they are not, then use a technique such as Paired Comparison Analysis to estimate them.
Step 4
Now multiply each of your scores from step 2 by the values for relative importance of the factor that you calculated in step 3. This will give you weighted scores for each option/factor combination.
Step 5
Finally, add up these weighted scores for each of your options. The option that scores the highest wins!
Tip:
If your intuition tells you that the top scoring option isn’t the best one, then reflect on the scores and weightings that you’ve applied. This may be a sign that certain factors are more important to you than you initially thought.
Also, if an option scores very poorly for a factor, decide whether this rules it out altogether.
Example
A caterer needs to find a new supplier for his basic ingredients. He has four options.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Receive new career skills every week, plus get our latest offers and a free downloadable Personal Development Plan workbook.
Read our Privacy PolicyFactors that he wants to consider are:
- Cost.
- Quality.
- Location.
- Reliability.
- Payment options.
Firstly he draws up the table shown in figure 1, and scores each option by how well it satisfies each factor:
Figure 1: Example Decision Matrix Analysis Showing Unweighted Assessment of How Each Supplier Satisfies Each Factor
| Factors: | Cost | Quality | Location | Reliability | Payment Options | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weights: | ||||||
| Supplier 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| Supplier 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| Supplier 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| Supplier 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Next he decides the relative weights for each of the factors. He multiplies these by the scores already entered, and totals them. This is shown in figure 2:
Figure 2: Example Decision Matrix Analysis Showing Weighted Assessment of How Each Supplier Satisfies Each Factor
| Factors: | Cost | Quality | Location | Reliability | Payment Options | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weights: | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Supplier 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 15 |
| Supplier 2 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 24 |
| Supplier 3 | 8 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 25 |
| Supplier 4 | 8 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 32 |
This makes it clear to the caterer that Supplier 4 is the best option, despite the lack of flexibility of its payment options.
Key Points
Decision Matrix Analysis helps you to decide between several options, where you need to take many different factors into account.
To use the tool, lay out your options as rows on a table. Set up the columns to show the factors you need to consider. Score each choice for each factor using numbers from 0 (poor) to 5 (very good), and then allocate weights to show the importance of each of these factors.
Multiply each score by the weight of the factor, to show its contribution to the overall selection. Finally add up the total scores for each option. The highest scoring option will be the best option.
Note:
Decision Matrix Analysis is the simplest form of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), also known as Multiple Criteria Decision Aid or Multiple Criteria Decision Management (MCDM). Sophisticated MCDA can involve highly complex modeling of different potential scenarios, using advanced mathematics.
A lot of business decision making, however, is based on approximate or subjective data. Where this is the case, Decision Matrix Analysis may be all that’s needed.
This site teaches you the skills you need for a happy and successful career; and this is just one of many tools and resources that you'll find here at Mind Tools. Subscribe to our free newsletter, or join the Mind Tools Club and really supercharge your career!
Welcome to the Club and thanks for asking the question. Step 3 is all about putting the items into a priority order to then be able to more easily make a decision. This makes me think of a coaching question when working to clarify a client's values by asking 'if you could have only one of these values met, which one would it be?' Once they had identified that first one, I would repeat the question. This type of exercise helps put values into a priority order, even though all are important. From that point of clarity, they can more easily make decisions.
It would be great to continue this discussion in the Forums so come on over and we can chat some more on this topic or anything else.
Midgie
Mind Tools Team
Please enlighten me about step #3: why is it allowed to score 0 for the importance of the factors if the factor is absolutely unimportant in the decision? All scores in step #4 will also be 0 for the weighted combination of factor and option. It seems that it won't make sense to include a factor that is not important.
hoping for a response. thank you.
Welcome to the Club and thank you for your comments.
My role here is to help you get the most from your membership, so if you have any questions, please let me know. You might also consider coming over to the Forums area to see what we have been chatting about and ask any questions of your own.
Hope to see you around.
Midgie
Mind Tools Team